Beyond standard hearing care

Solutions

EarDiTech delivers measurable results across precision diagnostics and augmented hearing: the CochSyn test for hidden hearing loss, and CoNNear for personalised hearing compensation.

  • For people with hearing difficulties: precise diagnosis and an individualised solution to protect your quality of life.
  • For hearing care professionals: earlier detection and a faster, easier fitting process.
  • For manufacturers: embedded, neural-network-based processing for hearables, hearing aids, cochlear implants, and speech recognition.

For the scientific background behind these results, see our Scientific Evidence page.

CochSyn diagnostic results

The CochSyn device measures envelope-following responses (EFRs) to quantify hidden hearing loss. In the CochSyn study, EFRs were recorded from young (y), older (o), normal-hearing (NH), and hearing-impaired (HI) participants. Statistical testing shows significant differences between all groups: both aging and hearing damage reduce EFR strength, as expected from auditory neuroscience research.

EFR results by participant group: young, older, normal hearing, and hearing impaired

CoNNear compensation results

Sounds better

HASPI (objective)

HASPI (Hearing Aid Speech Perception Index) is an objective measure of how well speech can be understood after hearing-aid processing. Higher scores mean better predicted speech intelligibility.

NAL-NL2 is the current industry-standard fitting rule. OHC is our own outer hair cell compensation strategy, designed to compete with NAL-NL2. CS is the very first hearing-aid algorithm that attempts to compensate for hidden hearing loss (cochlear synaptopathy) within a hearing-aid framework.

HASPI scores comparing unprocessed, NAL-NL2, CS, OHC and OHC_CS conditions

MUSHRA (patient testing)

In a listener study with n = 14, participants rated sound quality across speech in quiet (SiQ), speech in noise (SiN), classical music, and pop music. Green means the processed sound was rated better than unprocessed; red means worse; a + means the rating was significantly better than NAL-NL2 processing.

MUSHRA summary table comparing NAL and OHC across sound categories

Performs better

Phoneme accuracy (objective)

This plot shows the neural representation error (NRMSE) between hearing-impaired and normal-hearing models across phoneme categories. A lower score means the processed signal is closer to normal hearing and predicts better speech understanding.

CoNNear NRMSE results across phoneme categories

Speech intelligibility (patient testing)

Paired listener testing with n = 14 shows a significant improvement in word recognition with OHC compensation compared to unprocessed audio. On average, tested patients showed a 12.5% improvement in speech understanding.

Unprocessed vs OHC compensation performance for 14 listeners

Algorithm comparison (ongoing study)

In an ongoing clinical study, patients listen to speech processed with different hearing-aid algorithms, OHC (outer hair cell compensation), CS (cochlear synaptopathy compensation), and OHC+CS (combined), compared to unprocessed audio.

CS (cochlear synaptopathy compensation)

VE experiment improvement with CS compensation

OHC+CS (combined compensation)

VE experiment improvement with OHC+CS compensation

OHC (outer hair cell compensation)

VE experiment improvement with OHC compensation

Similar or less computing power required

Low-latency real-time processing makes CoNNear suitable for hearables and hearing aids, matching or outperforming leading commercial devices.

Latency comparison across hearing devices

Use cases

CochSyn goes beyond standard hearing-aid fitting. By measuring envelope-following responses, it enables earlier and more accurate assessment of hearing damage, including hidden hearing loss that audiograms miss. This opens monitoring applications where damage must be detected before it becomes clinically obvious.

Noise exposure monitoring

Large-scale music events can cause subclinical hearing damage that is not visible on a standard audiogram. EFR-based monitoring can flag this neural damage earlier, supporting preventive action for concert-goers, musicians, and event organisers (De Poortere et al., 2026, Scientific Reports).

Early markers of ototoxicity

Platinum-based chemotherapy can cause sensorineural hearing loss. EFR markers can reveal this damage earlier than conventional tests, enabling more timely intervention and better protection of hearing during cancer treatment (Van Der Biest et al., 2026, Ear & Hearing).

Want to know more about the science behind these results? Visit our Scientific Evidence page.